The Oatmeal has some great comical grammar posts to help you remember how to use a semicolon, the proper use of the word “literally” and more. They are so useful that I bought the set and put them up on the walls of the Toronto Star’s training room.
X-bar theory (= X-bar syntax) is a linguistic postulate according to which all phrases and sentences in languages are structured according to a certain (syntactic) model; this model can be made explicit through a linguistic analysis and consequently can be depicted graphically with the help of strictly hierarchical diagrams.
The X-bar theory was developed within generative (transformational) grammar. Its “generative” character is shown in that 1) all grammatically correct phrases or sentences are assumed to be structured according to certain principles (rules) and 2) all languages are assumed to have similar basic principles or rules.
Chomsky (1970) and Jackendoff (1977) are considered to be the founders of the X-bar theory.
Below is an example (see the end of the post for the explanations) of a phrase analyzed with the help of the X-bar theory.
X-bar theory conventions (terminology, abbreviations, and symbols/labelling):
View original post 454 more words
While diction determines word choice, syntax determines where the words are placed. Language, without syntax, is nonsense – words strung together with no method to the madness. We all use syntax to speak and write without thinking about it, repeating what we have heard before. Unique syntax requires mixing up that order, without creating nonsense. Do you recall Yoda’s distinctive style of speaking in the Star Wars movie series? Simply take the predicate object or predicate adjective at the end of a sentence and move it to the front. Voila – Yoda speak. “But what is a predicate object and predicate adjective?” students ask mystified. Basically it is everything in a normal sentence that comes after the verb.
Which brings up the next point – Learning how to use syntax to create a unique voice requires a fundamental knowledge of grammar. I recall, in my junior high days, creating lengthy…
View original post 259 more words
“How does this sound? I read aloud my newest blog entry to my husband. “I know the syntax isn’t exactly correct.”
“That’s so,” he said. “Sounds a little off.”
“Hey, I’m using poetic license,” I said in my defense.
“Ah, if that’s the case, I think they should take away your license.”
As I edit my latest work in progress, ( patting myself on the back at reaching close to 50,000 words) it looms large about how much poetic license I can take and yet adhere to the rules I learned so long ago. (The decade being the ’50s when learning to diagram sentences was a requirement) I made an A in grammar, by the way, but does being a stickler about all that make for interesting writing? I am leaning toward the view that although correct use of syntax is important, it is not necessary to adhere in all…
View original post 161 more words
gram·mat·i·cism [gruh-mat-uh-siz-uhm] Show IPA
a point or principle of grammar.
a grammatical definition.
1600–10; grammatic(al) + -ism
Based on the Random House Dictionary, © Random House, Inc. 2013.
Just another WordPress.com site
The website and blog of historian Chris Gehrz
tales from the journey home
Studies in Greek Language & Linguistics...
biblical, theological, personal reflections
This is my personal collection of thoughts and writings, mainly from much smarter people than I, which challenge me in my discipleship walk. Don't rush by these thoughts, but ponder them.
Christian Fiction Reviews by Nicole
To Give Hope and Encouragement through the Word of God
Life and Style
Dr. Andrew Joseph Pegoda
Dream big! Live bigger!
Cinema, music, opera, books, television, theater
Independent Authors Unite!
Botany and Travel in Israel and the Eastern Mediterranean
drunk on the arts
Bible Verses and Quotes with Photos
Smiling • Writing • Dreaming