The Oatmeal has some great comical grammar posts to help you remember how to use a semicolon, the proper use of the word “literally” and more. They are so useful that I bought the set and put them up on the walls of the Toronto Star’s training room.
X-bar theory (= X-bar syntax) is a linguistic postulate according to which all phrases and sentences in languages are structured according to a certain (syntactic) model; this model can be made explicit through a linguistic analysis and consequently can be depicted graphically with the help of strictly hierarchical diagrams.
The X-bar theory was developed within generative (transformational) grammar. Its “generative” character is shown in that 1) all grammatically correct phrases or sentences are assumed to be structured according to certain principles (rules) and 2) all languages are assumed to have similar basic principles or rules.
Chomsky (1970) and Jackendoff (1977) are considered to be the founders of the X-bar theory.
Below is an example (see the end of the post for the explanations) of a phrase analyzed with the help of the X-bar theory.
X-bar theory conventions (terminology, abbreviations, and symbols/labelling):
View original post 454 more words
While diction determines word choice, syntax determines where the words are placed. Language without syntax are words strung together with no method to the madness–in other words, nonsense. Our normal syntax mimics what we have heard before. Unique syntax requires mixing up that order without creating nonsense.
Do you recall Yoda’s distinctive style of speaking in the Star Wars movie series? Simply take the predicate object or predicate adjective at the end of a sentence and move it to the front. Voila–Yoda speak. “But what is a predicate object and predicate adjective?” you ask mystified. Basically it is everything in a normal syntax that follows after the verb.
Learning how to use syntax to create a unique voice requires a fundamental knowledge of grammar. I recall creating lengthy diagrams parsing complex sentences in my junior high days. But, diagramming went out of vogue (probably due to lack of time) just like…
View original post 255 more words
“How does this sound? I read aloud my newest blog entry to my husband. “I know the syntax isn’t exactly correct.”
“That’s so,” he said. “Sounds a little off.”
“Hey, I’m using poetic license,” I said in my defense.
“Ah, if that’s the case, I think they should take away your license.”
As I edit my latest work in progress, ( patting myself on the back at reaching close to 50,000 words) it looms large about how much poetic license I can take and yet adhere to the rules I learned so long ago. (The decade being the ’50s when learning to diagram sentences was a requirement) I made an A in grammar, by the way, but does being a stickler about all that make for interesting writing? I am leaning toward the view that although correct use of syntax is important, it is not necessary to adhere in all…
View original post 161 more words
gram·mat·i·cism [gruh-mat-uh-siz-uhm] Show IPA
a point or principle of grammar.
a grammatical definition.
1600–10; grammatic(al) + -ism
Based on the Random House Dictionary, © Random House, Inc. 2013.
Random things from my mind💭
A daily selection of the best content published on WordPress, collected for you by humans who love to read.
Art and the philosophy of life
Mary's English Blog - Improve your English Grammar, Speaking, Listening, Reading and Writing Here!
A Daughter's Healing Journey...
Inspiring the world
Looking for the signs of Jesus' return
Commentaries & Teachings
Truth based on facts
Observations & Reflections from Home & Abroad from the Side-Kick Traveller
notes from a Swedish amateur photographer © Ulrika Undén
Life is better in red
We are all in need of a savior each and everyday. I love sharing God's love to all humanity
Dr. Perry's Travel Blog
Beauty, Reviews, Swatches, Baking