: a particular form of expression or a peculiarity of phrasing; especially : a word or expression characteristic of a region, group, or cultural level
: style of discourse : phraseology
Developing writers often rely on “to be” verbs when communicating action. To-be verbs are all forms of “be”: is, am, are, was, were, be, being, and been. In some student papers, English teachers might find “is” as the verb in the majority of sentences. Even professional writers struggle with the over-reliance on “is” as a verb. So what is so wrong with using “is” and other to-be verbs in writing? Oh dear! I just used is as a verb in that last sentence!
Take a look at the following example:
The girl is pretty.
What does “pretty” look like? Is creates a vague description. What does the girl’s pretty actually look like?
The girl has flowing auburn hair, crimson lips, and eyes I could drown in for days.
In the first example, the is verb creates a lazy sentence; it isn’t showing the…
View original post 423 more words
While diction determines word choice, syntax determines where the words are placed. Language without syntax are words strung together with no method to the madness–in other words, nonsense. Our normal syntax mimics what we have heard before. Unique syntax requires mixing up that order without creating nonsense.
Do you recall Yoda’s distinctive style of speaking in the Star Wars movie series? Simply take the predicate object or predicate adjective at the end of a sentence and move it to the front. Voila–Yoda speak. “But what is a predicate object and predicate adjective?” you ask mystified. Basically it is everything in a normal syntax that follows after the verb.
Learning how to use syntax to create a unique voice requires a fundamental knowledge of grammar. I recall creating lengthy diagrams parsing complex sentences in my junior high days. But, diagramming went out of vogue (probably due to lack of time) just like…
View original post 255 more words
“How does this sound? I read aloud my newest blog entry to my husband. “I know the syntax isn’t exactly correct.”
“That’s so,” he said. “Sounds a little off.”
“Hey, I’m using poetic license,” I said in my defense.
“Ah, if that’s the case, I think they should take away your license.”
As I edit my latest work in progress, ( patting myself on the back at reaching close to 50,000 words) it looms large about how much poetic license I can take and yet adhere to the rules I learned so long ago. (The decade being the ’50s when learning to diagram sentences was a requirement) I made an A in grammar, by the way, but does being a stickler about all that make for interesting writing? I am leaning toward the view that although correct use of syntax is important, it is not necessary to adhere in all…
View original post 161 more words